diumenge, 30 d’agost del 2026

ORRIOLS AL THE NEW YORK TIMES....


Her Movement Used to Fight Fascism. Now It Fights Globalism.

28.08.2026





A lot of politicians in Spain were disoriented this summer when more than 70,000 migrants overran the beachfront border that separates Morocco from the Spanish outpost of Ceuta. But not Sílvia Orriols. The mayor of Ripoll and a member of the Catalan regional legislature in Barcelona, she was on familiar ground: By fiercely opposing migration from North Africa, she has turned her small Catalan Alliance into one of the fastest-growing political parties in Europe, with the potential to disrupt Spanish politics on a much larger scale.

Ms. Orriols criticized the lack of an effective police presence in Ceuta and mocked the Spanish state’s priorities. She reminded her followers on X that in 2017, Catalonia’s attempt to stage a vote on independence from Spain led to a far more severe crackdown by the national police. “They beat Catalans with truncheons and fired rubber bullets at us for voting in a referendum,” she wrote. “Have you seen any truncheons or rubber bullets in Ceuta? It is urgent that we break with this state that allows repeated violations of its borders.”

In the stridency of her anti-immigration position, Ms. Orriols, 41, can sound like the staunchest kind of right-wing nationalist, a type familiar in European politics today. She wants a moratorium on immigration. She has called for deporting all immigrants who have broken the law in Catalonia, even those who have committed small crimes. She has campaigned to remove halal menus from public schools and argued that Islam is incompatible with Western values. She is the latest example of how anti-immigration fervor can galvanize voters in fast-changing societies.

But apart from her attitude toward migration, Ms. Orriols’s views are not particularly conservative. She has no objection to the constitutional innovations of the past century in women’s rights and gay rights. “I don’t believe in abortion,” she said when I interviewed her at Ripoll’s City Hall in June, “but I believe in the right to abortion.” She wears a cross but appears more comfortable talking about Catalonia’s Christian roots than about Christianity itself. Nor does she see herself or her party as wrapped up in any international movement of the right or in sympathy with other European parties.

This is not necessarily a contradiction. For most of the past century, the tradition that Ms. Orriols represents — Catalan nationalism — has been left-leaning, opposed to authoritarianism and associated with a cosmopolitan elite in Barcelona. Catalonia was a last redoubt of the second Spanish Republic against the military uprising of Gen. Francisco Franco, which triumphed with the backing of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy in the late 1930s. Catalans chafed under his dictatorship for four decades, venerating their history of resistance and being venerated for it, thanks in large part to George Orwell’s “Homage to Catalonia.”

There is no question, however, that in her unwavering opposition to immigration, Ms. Orriols is fashioning a version of Catalan nationalism that is more populist, more rural and more confrontational. The people she represents are farmers and villagers in the Pyrenees, not professors and consultants in Barcelona. The main threat to the region, in her view, comes not from Madrid but from the Muslim world. She has shifted the question of Catalonia from one of political power to one of ethnic survival — and opened herself up to accusations of bigotry in the process.

Her outlook is built on familiar themes of culture and language. Catalonia’s history runs back to Charlemagne. Its language has less in common with Spanish than with the Occitan tongues of southern France. “Before Franco, 95 percent of the people spoke Catalan; with Franco, big waves of migration began,” Ms. Orriols said, referring to an influx of labor from poorer parts of Spain in the 1960s. “And now, thanks to immigration all over the world, we’re down to 30 percent — from 95 percent to 30 in less than a century.”

She added: “That’s our death knell as a nation. If we don’t reverse this, if we don’t manage to change this, our nation is dead.”

This message is gaining political momentum. Catalan Alliance took only 3.8 percent of the vote in regional elections in 2024, winning two seats in the regional assembly. But a June poll delivered a shock: It showed the party now has the backing of 15.1 percent of Catalans, enough for 25 seats if elections were held today — which would marginalize the region’s old center-right party, Junts, in the same way the National Front has done to the center-right Gaullists in neighboring France.

The political scientist Xavier Torrens, the author of a book on Ms. Orriols, told an interviewer for the Barcelona daily La Vanguardia that whereas Marine Le Pen had taken a “slow route” to power, Ms. Orriols and Catalan Alliance were more likely to take the “fast route.”

Many Spaniards have been shocked to see anti-immigration sentiment making such headway in progressive Catalonia. There may be a larger lesson here for the West. Immigration has helped bring a once-repudiated ex-president back to power in the United States, made nationalist parties the most popular in Germany and in France, driven Britain from the European Union and strengthened restrictive parties in Hungary and Poland. While Ms. Orriols’s magnetism and oratorical power have been indispensable to her success, her rise is further evidence that among electoral issues, limiting migration has a singular power to reshape politics and buoy up politicians, in any kind of society.

Ms. Orriols was born in 1984 in Vic, a city just south of Ripoll with a vast, picturesque plaza, and a meatpacking industry that has made it a magnet for immigrants. Today 30 percent of residents there are foreign born, and in 2022, more children had fathers born in Africa (35.1 percent) than fathers born in Spain (34.5 percent). Ripoll, which has a population of about 11,000, is also changing fast. There were few immigrants to speak of in its schools when Ms. Orriols was a student a quarter-century ago. Today immigrants account for 16 percent of Ripoll’s population and about 45 percent of its births.

Ms. Orriols read a lot of Catalan history in her youth and earned a library science degree in 2004. During our interview in Ripoll she described a political trajectory that took her from sympathy with the youth wing of the Republican Left of Catalonia (the present-day powerhouse of the nationalist left) to her present position.

In 2017, in her early 30s, she rallied to the movement for independence by referendum spearheaded by the Republican Left and the center-right party that would eventually become today’s Junts. The Spanish government deemed the referendum illegal. When the vote produced a low-turnout landslide and a Catalan declaration of independence, Madrid suspended parts of Catalonia’s autonomy and prepared sedition cases against the referendum organizers (many of whom were later convicted and sentenced). Ms. Orriols’s commitment to Catalan independence only intensified.

But something else happened in 2017 to affect Ms. Orriols’s nationalism. That August a group of young men carried out Spain’s worst terrorist attacks in more than a decade, including racing a van through Les Rambles, the iconic pedestrian street in Barcelona, killing 13 and wounding 130 others. The ringleader of the ISIS-linked plot turned out to be Abdelbaki Essati, a charismatic imam at Ripoll’s mosque who had recruited most of the plot’s operatives from young members of Ripoll’s Moroccan community. They spoke good Catalan and had struck their neighbors as well integrated.

Even today, Ms. Orriols’s social media accounts radiate an undiminished incredulity and rage. “A Moroccan tried to stab a 13-year-old girl to death,” she posted this month on X, referring to an assault in the Catalan town Puigcerdà allegedly by a North African man. “And yet there are still scoundrels who want to ‘welcome’ more of them.”

In May 2019, Ms. Orriols won a seat on the Ripoll City Council for the National Front of Catalonia, the name of an old party of the nationalist left. Her platform, however, was already so hostile to immigration that her rivals attacked her as a xenophobe and a rightist. The attacks hardly dented her popularity.

As late as the 1990s, Spain had little immigration to speak of. That changed with a vengeance. Starting the century with one of the lowest fertility rates in the world (1.2 children per woman) and roughly 40 million people, it now has close to 50 million, and about 10 million of these are foreign born. Most immigrants arrive from Latin America, sharing Spain’s language and its religious traditions.

Madrid, where many restaurant workers and gardeners hail from Central and South America, will remind urban Americans of the Clinton years. So will the booming economy. Spain’s gross domestic product is the fastest growing in Western Europe (though many economists doubt the boom is a boom at all, if one measures G.D.P. per capita). Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez offered permanent residence to hundreds of thousands of immigrants last winter; more than a million have applied.

But Catalonia’s experience with immigration has been different from — and more disruptive than — the rest of Spain’s. Like the rest of the country, Catalonia has seen its population bulk up, from six million in 2000 to more than eight million now. But there, Spanish is not the ancestral language. In addition, more foreign-born arrivals come from Morocco than from any Latin American country. Longtime residents, particularly in Barcelona, feel their culture is being drowned. It is a worry of long standing: When Catalonia experienced migration from poorer parts of Spain in the 1960s, it led to a rising linguistic assertiveness among Catalans.

The stimulative effect of immigration has also been less evident in Catalonia than in Madrid. Greater Madrid’s G.D.P. blew past Catalonia’s in 2019. And with less upside, the downsides of the surging population are felt more acutely. Alleging that Ripoll’s immigrant minority collects nearly half of the town’s welfare benefits, Ms. Orriols has tightened scrutiny of the municipal procedure by which people register for services and benefits, excluding those who cannot document their residence.

Many Catalans have been left confused: They traditionally thought of their nationalism as an exceptional one, an underdog’s allegiance — not provincial and jealous but open and idealistic. Even before Catalonia’s opposition to Franco, urban progressivism was part of its national identity. Generally, Catalans can accept that their nationalism is a matter of soil but prefer not to consider it a matter of blood. Or so it seems in Barcelona.

But like other polities dominated by one big, glamorous city, Catalonia is provincial practically everywhere else, and it is the countryside that is now the driving force of its nationalism. Ms. Orriols’s electoral stronghold is in what journalists often call the “fuet corridor,” after the dry sausage that mountain residents gnaw on. In Parliament, with her bootleg jeans and her Dr. Martens, a print top with a blazer thrown over it and a visible silver cross, she not only represents rural Catalonia; she embodies it.

She is blunt. “I will keep speaking clar i català, no matter how much they rebuke and fine me,” she posted on Instagram — “clar i català” being the Catalan equivalent of “plain English.” When I asked at the end of our interview whether there was anything that might help people understand her better, she replied, “Just this: The key to our electoral success is that we’ve abandoned the political correctness they imposed on us and adopted the language of the people.”

That language has raised alarms. In 2024, a foundation filed a hate-crime complaint against Ms. Orriols in Barcelona that cited her heated statements and the restrictions she imposed on municipal registration. Last year, in a parliamentary debate over a burkini ban that Ms. Orriols imposed on her town’s public swimming pool, the president of Catalonia, Salvador Illa, accused her of practicing a “discourse of hate.” In July, the Catalan Parliament reprimanded Ms. Orriols for having said that a veil-wearing member “normalizes misogyny and Islamic fundamentalism.”

But the accusations of racism and intolerance routinely lobbed her way seem to have been dulled by overuse. Except as cynical attempts to shut her up, the words mean nothing to her. “This is not racism,” she told Le Monde in the spring. “This is survival.” And on Instagram recently, she posted, “The only ‘extreme right’ that threatens our rights, liberties and lives is Islam.”

What truly discomfits more traditional Catalan nationalists, however, is not Ms. Orriols’s radicalism; it’s that her nationalism and her radicalism are inseparable. Immigration policies are the responsibility of Madrid, and she has stated unambiguously that her party has no interest in taking part in the Spanish government. So without independence, her hard-line anti-immigration posture is just idle talk. It makes sense only as part of what Catalan nationalism is becoming.

The nationalist torch was once carried by those who feared fascism. It’s now carried by those who fear globalism. And not just in Catalonia.

dijous, 20 d’agost del 2026

LETTER TO ANGLO-QUEBECERS FROM PQ LEADER

Paul St-Pierre Plamondon: Anglo-Quebecers deserve better government

The PQ will solve Quebec's problems, for the benefit of English- and French-speakers

The following is an open letter written by Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon to Quebec’s English-speaking population.

Foto de la Universitat McGill, anglòfona, de Montreal

To all English-speaking Quebecers,

I am writing to you today with a sense of hope and an open mind at the dawn of a pivotal election campaign.

While we may not always agree on Quebec’s constitutional future, we share something fundamental: a deep attachment to this nation, its democratic institutions and the quality of life we want to preserve and strengthen for future generations. That is why I believe the election ahead is of critical importance for our shared future.

Because Quebec certainly deserves better than what we’ve seen in the last eight years.

We must state it plainly and without hesitation: we’ve gone through one of the worst regressions in quality of life in Quebec’s recent history. Quebecers know it, and they see it in their daily lives. Their purchasing power has vanished, home ownership has become an increasingly distant dream for too many young people. Our health-care and education systems are struggling to provide the quality of services that our citizens have every right to expect. Security and tidiness have suddenly become major issues in our cities and the number of homeless people has exploded. Meanwhile, our infrastructure projects make headlines only because of soaring costs and endless delays. While the government neglected road maintenance, schools and hospitals, it has normalized the waste of public funds through scandals like SAAQclic and financial debacles such as Northvolt. A part of that decline is connected to the ideological beliefs at the federal level that brought uncontrolled and unlimited immigration during those eight years, yet the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) chose to stand by as a resigned spectator, leading to the consequences we see today.

Quebecers were promised a wind of “change” by the CAQ. Instead, what we have witnessed is not even the status quo — it is decline. We cannot blame citizens for losing faith in the state when, year after year, they pay more and receive less.

I am convinced that we all share this assessment. Over the past months, many Anglo-Quebecers have told me they would vote for the Parti Québécois (PQ) for the first time in their lives, simply because they agree with our stances on a vast majority issues. Underneath that pledge is also the fact the Anglos don’t fear the PQ anymore, since Anglos and Francos share the same realities and concerns. Public discourse has too often encouraged the mistaken belief that the concerns of French-speaking and English-speaking Quebecers are fundamentally at odds. Nothing could be further from the truth. We are all in the same boat. We live under the same institutions. We pay the same taxes. We deserve the same high-quality public services and individual financial well-being.

Together, we have a shared responsibility to reject decline. We would be wrong to accept a Quebec that has grown accustomed to doubting itself, to distrusting its institutions or to settling for less. We would be wrong to allow our ambitions to shrink. Above all, we would be wrong to believe that our interests somehow diverge simply because of the language we speak at home.

The Parti Québécois is the party of all Quebecers. It believes Quebecers should govern themselves. But that project has never and will never be a project that excludes the English-speaking minority. On the contrary, its purpose is to build a new model founded on social harmony and the idea that we are all Quebecers. It seeks to give all Quebecers the ability to make their own decisions, to shape their own future and to build a government that is more effective, and more accountable.

As we clearly stated in our blue book, the country of Quebec that we are building is one where the rights of the historic English-speaking minority will be fully protected. Its institutions will continue to exist and be called on to play their essential role. The Parti Québécois will even ensure that the rights currently enjoyed by the English-speaking community are entrenched in the constitution.

In the years ahead, if Quebecers so choose, we will collectively resume our reflection on the place Quebec wishes to occupy within Canada and within the world, and we will decide that question democratically. But that conversation should not put aside the numerous urgent issues before us in this upcoming election

Who can Quebecers trust to get our nation back on track? Who can embody the change in the way we govern that we so desperately need?

Can we trust the CAQ to restore our public services after they have deteriorated under its leadership? Can we trust the party to make us wealthier when life has never been more expensive? Can we seriously believe that a government that promised so much and delivered so little will suddenly solve the very problems it allowed to flourish?

The real ballot question this upcoming October is who can form a good government for Quebec: a competent government, an honest government, a government prepared to tell the truth about the challenges we face and then hit the ground running to solve them.

It is in that spirit that I extend my hand to you. Let us take an honest look at what we have in common. And when others once again seek to pit French-speaking and English-speaking Quebecers against one another, let us remember the simple, enduring truth that former premier Lucien Bouchard once expressed: “It’s good to know there is one unalterable truth we can cling onto: the knowledge that in the end we are all Quebecers. Nous sommes tous Québécois. We all love Québec --because Quebec is our home.”

NOTA DE J.S.:Cal tenir en compte que, a diferència de Catalunya, la comunitat anglòfona, existeix des la conquesta britànica, el 1763, establerta al Quebec. Els anglòfons del Quebec, fins al 1960s, van ocupar llocs preeminents a dins del Quebec, sobretot els procedents d'Anglaterra i Escòcia, i més modestos, els procedents d'Irlanda. Els irlandesos, en concret, en una part important, es van integrar més en la societat quebequesa, sobretot per la influència de l'Església catòlica, seguida també majoritàriament dels quebequesos francòfons. A partir de la dècada dels 60 del segle XX, però, la situació privilegiada dels anglòfons al Quebec va començar a decaure, a mesuria que el nou independentisme quebequès, i sobretot, la fundació del Partit Quebequès, el 1968, va començar a créixer i fins i tot va arribar al govern l'any 1976. En definitiva, els angloquebequesos fa 263 anys, moltes generacions, doncs que són presents al Quebec. Per contra, a Catalunya la presència d'espanyols, no va començar fins a les obres de l'exposició universal del 1929 i sobretot amb el règim franquista, en els anys cinquanta a setanta, en un intent de minorització demogràfica, molt més recent, inspirada clarament en les polítiques feixistes de la Itàlia mussoliniana dels anys 20, i que en les darreres dècades s'han vista reforçades per l'enginyeria demogràfica dels governs del PP i del PSOE, amb el foment de la regularització administrativa, sobretot de contingents de població llatinoamericana, arribada via aèria (on l'aerport de Barajas ha jugat un paper fonamental) i, de forma més minoritària, de població d'Àfrica i Àsia per via marítima. Es tracta doncs, de dues situacions totalment divergents.

dimarts, 18 d’agost del 2026

DÉCLARATION DU PRÉSIDENT DU PARTI QUÉBÉCOIS, PAUL ST-PIERRE PLAMONDON


Le Parti Québécois s’engage à ne pas tenir de référendum tant que DonaldTrump sera président

Je m’adresse à vous ce matin à titre de chef de parti qui travaille ardemment à trouver la voie qui permettra de remettre le Québec sur les rails au cours des prochaines années. Comme vous le savez, le Québec a connu des reculs et un déclin inquiétant au cours des dernières années: pensons à l’augmentation de l’itinérance, au recul du français et de notre culture québécoise, au recul du pouvoir d’achat d’une majorité d’entre nous, et en général à un recul de la confiance envers nos institutions après plusieurs scandales de dilapidation des fonds publics. Comme vous le savez également, bon nombre de ces reculs sont liés à des décisions d’un gouvernement fédéral qui n’est pas le nôtre et qui s’est moqué des protestations du gouvernement caquiste, notamment sur les questions de fiscalité, de français, de culture et de politiques migratoires.

Bref, nous sommes une vaste majorité à trouver que notre société ne va pas dans la bonne direction et il y a un large consensus au Québec voulant qu’après huit ans de gouvernement caquiste, le Québec a besoin d’un vrai changement. Les Québécoises et les Québécois ont besoin de retrouver confiance et de retrouver le goût du Québec, le goût de notre avenir. Le 5 octobre, le vote doit donc d’abord porter sur cette question fondamentale : à qui pouvons-nous faire confiance pour remettre le Québec sur la bonne voie ? 

C’est dans cet esprit que je veux clarifier aujourd’hui deux choses.

Oui, un gouvernement du Parti Québécois consultera les Québécois sur l’indépendance du Québec lors de son premier mandat s’il est élu.

Cet engagement de ma part est le même depuis maintenant six ans. Tout le monde est au courant. J’ai toujours été clair et constant sur le fait qu’un jour, les Québécois vont décider par eux-mêmes, et que ce jour approche. Je crois que l’indépendance est la seule solution pour que le Québec réalise son plein potentiel et échappe à un déclin culturel, linguistique et financier qui, si nous demeurons dans le Canada, est déjà en cours.

La deuxième chose que je veux clarifier concerne le moment précis de cette consultation. Au cours des derniers mois, je me suis déjà exprimé sur le fait que le Parti Québécois exercerait son jugement pour choisir le moment de la consultation – ce qui, pour moi, allait de soi – je ne m’étais toutefois pas encore exprimé formellement sur le point suivant. Un gouvernement du Parti Québécois ne tiendra pas de référendum tant que Donald Trump sera président des États-Unis. 

Pourquoi? 

Parce qu’un enjeu aussi crucial que celui de l’avenir politique du Québec exige des conditions qui permettent un débat éclairé et serein. Il ne doit pas être confisqué par les soubresauts de la politique américaine, ni par les coups d’éclat d’un président imprévisible, ni par des campagnes de peur.

Cette imprévisibilité de l’administration américaine nuira à notre processus ainsi qu’à la qualité du débat sur notre avenir comme nation. De plus, dans tous les cas, il demeure que, dans l’état actuel du Québec, un gouvernement appelé à ramasser les pots cassés de la CAQ aura amplement de défis et de tâches à accomplir dès le début de son mandat. Les défis sont nombreux et colossaux, il y a du pain sur la planche. 

J’ai donc choisi de désamorcer complètement l’argument selon lequel ce serait le pire moment pour réfléchir à notre avenir en raison de Trump, en écartant la possibilité de la tenue d’un référendum d’ici la fin de son deuxième mandat. Nous pourrons donc ainsi mener une campagne sur nos propositions pour aider les Québécois et relancer notre avenir, plutôt que sur des arguments de peur redondants et stériles. 

Formellement, cela signifie donc qu’un gouvernement du Parti Québécois ne tiendra pas de référendum avant le 20 janvier 2029, date de la fin du mandat de Trump à la Maison-Blanche

D’ici là, notre priorité demeure claire: gouverner le Québec avec constance et redonner confiance aux Québécoises et aux Québécois. 

Nous allons remettre de l’ordre dans nos services publics en réduisant la bureaucratie, nous attaquer avec efficacité à la crise du coût de la vie, répondre à la crise du logement, lutter contre l’itinérance, mettre fin au gaspillage éhonté de fonds publics, nous occuper de la santé physique et mentale de nos gens et redonner aux Québécois le goût du Québec. Le Parti Québécois vous présentera une équipe d’une qualité inégalée pour relever ce défi. 

Comme les gouvernements de René Lévesque et de Jacques Parizeau l’ont fait avant nous, nous voulons redonner aux Québécois confiance en eux-mêmes, comme nation. 

La CAQ de Christine Fréchette devra rendre des comptes sur huit ans d’inaction et de mauvaise gestion. Nous ne les laisserons pas nous distraire pour tenter de tromper la volonté de changement réelle des Québécois. J’ai confiance en notre capacité comme peuple de se relever et de décider par nous-mêmes de notre avenir.

D’ici là, notre priorité demeure claire: gouverner le Québec avec constance et redonner confiance aux Québécoises et aux Québécois.

Je ferai avec plaisir une tournée d’entrevues aujourd’hui pour répondre aux questions, et avec encore plus de plaisir que j’irai à votre rencontre au cours de cette campagne.

dilluns, 17 d’agost del 2026

ESCÒRIA A ELIMINAR, POLÍTICAMENT, EN LES PROPERES ELECCIONS MUNICIPALS




Dissortadament, no són els únics, però aquestes tres són els principals que hem d'eliminar, políticament, en les properes eleccions municipals. I, millor encara, si els substitueixen els candidats d'Aliança Catalana. Endavant! Salvem Catalunya (i Barcelona, Lleida i Tarragona!)